View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0015870 | ParaView | (No Category) | public | 2015-12-10 13:53 | 2016-02-24 19:11 | ||||
Reporter | Orion Poplawski | ||||||||
Assigned To | Utkarsh Ayachit | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | |||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0015870: 5.0.0 Build failure on arm | ||||||||
Description | Building 5.0.0-RC1 for Fedora Rawhide on arm: /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC1-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c: In function '__cpuid': /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC1-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c:95:3: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile("cpuid" : "=a"(out[0]), "=b"(out[1]), "=c"(out[2]), "=d"(out[3]) ^ /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC1-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c: In function 'check_xcr0_ymm': /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC1-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c:124:3: error: unknown register name '%edx' in 'asm' __asm__("xgetbv" : "=a" (xcr0) : "c" (0) : "%edx"); ^ /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC1-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c: In function 'get_cpu_features': /builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC1-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c:124:3: error: unknown register name '%edx' in 'asm' __asm__("xgetbv" : "=a" (xcr0) : "c" (0) : "%edx"); ^ | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Project | TBD | ||||||||
Topic Name | |||||||||
Type | incorrect functionality | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Relationships | |
Relationships |
Notes | |
(0035635) Orion Poplawski (reporter) 2016-01-05 21:18 |
This is still blocking our Fedora builds of paraview. From what I've gathered, it looks like cpuid is only available in privileged mode on arm, and that you really should be querying the OS for cpu features anyway. |
(0035636) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2016-01-06 10:49 |
MR: https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/559 [^] |
(0035791) Alan Scott (manager) 2016-02-24 19:11 |
Trusting Utkarsh, closing untested. |
Notes |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2015-12-10 13:53 | Orion Poplawski | New Issue | |
2016-01-05 21:18 | Orion Poplawski | Note Added: 0035635 | |
2016-01-06 10:49 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Note Added: 0035636 | |
2016-01-06 10:49 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Status | backlog => gatekeeper review |
2016-01-06 10:49 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Resolution | open => fixed |
2016-01-06 10:49 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Assigned To | => Utkarsh Ayachit |
2016-01-06 13:11 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Status | gatekeeper review => customer review |
2016-02-24 19:11 | Alan Scott | Note Added: 0035791 | |
2016-02-24 19:11 | Alan Scott | Status | customer review => closed |
Issue History |
Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team |