[Paraview] ParaViewWeb installation - partial success, no mouse interaction
utkarsh.ayachit at kitware.com
Sun Dec 5 11:24:03 EST 2010
logon to the administrative page at:
Login using admin/admin (unless you changed it in pw-config.properties file).
Now with the shuttle app running, look at the error and output logs
for the active processes. Is it spewing out any error messages?
What browser are you using? What platform?
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Mario Rossi <m.rossi40 at rocketmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Paraview(Web) Users and Developers,
> I have installed ParaViewWeb as closely as possible after
> It seems to work partially, but not ready for "production" use.
> These things are ok:
> * http://localhost:8080/PWService lists the active processes
> * http://localhost:8080/PWSimple shows the six spheres
> * http://localhost:8080/PWConsole executes the example code when copy&pasted.
> This does not work:
> * http://localhost:8080/PWSimple does not rotate the spheres when dragging the
> mouse. There is no reaction at all. Only the flex renderer makes the status bar
> flicker between "Transferring data from localhost" and "Waiting for
> localhost..." when I drag the mouse inside. *Some* messages seem to be sent.
> * http://localhost:8080/PWShuttle only shows the slider and the "Flash..."
> combobox and a blue area. I cannot interact with the slider or the combox box.
> I am not sure if I followed the Wiki correctly.
> The Wiki says: "The automatic launch of this executable[PWServer] is done by the
> WebServer/CoreService application."
> And the Wiki mentions: "For the runtime ... ActiveMQ 3.x, the JMS brocker" (but
> no details for activemq installation are given)
> I don't see where to set up the automatic launch of PWServer, and again the
> PWServer depends on a running ActiveMQ.
> How I am starting things is the following:
> 1) $ activemq start
> The output is: ... INFO BrokerService - ActiveMQ JMS
> Message Broker (localhost, ID:xyz:0) started
> 2) $ PWServer
> The output is: JMS Initialized in 0.138528 seconds
> sessionID : org.paraview.paraweb
> logLevel : ERROR
> Processing Engine Initialized in 0.590458 seconds
> Processing engine is started !
> 3) $ apache-tomcat-6.0.29/bin/startup.sh
> The output is: Using CATALINA_BASE: /opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.29
> Using CATALINA_HOME: /opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.29
> Using CATALINA_TMPDIR: /opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.29/temp
> Using JRE_HOME: /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun-126.96.36.199
> Using CLASSPATH: /opt/tomcat/apache-tomcat-6.0.29/bin/bootstrap.jar
> I don't see any problems in the output of these commands, but is it ok to start
> them manually in this order?
> I am testing on a 2.8 GHz dual core Xeon with 2 GB of RAM. My first impression
> was that my setup is just extremely slow, but I doubt that this is the
> explanation. Firstly, the hardware should suffice, secondly there is absolutely
> NO interactivity.
> Can somebody help and suggest how to debug problems, or what I could check?
> Thanks for reading
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
More information about the ParaView