[Paraview] [ParaView] question about speed

Berk Geveci berk.geveci at kitware.com
Fri Jun 27 08:54:42 EDT 2008


Hi Michael,

Do you think there is still a difference between 3.2 and cvs?

-berk

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Michael Geppert <MichaelGeppert at gmx.net> wrote:
> Thanks, ParaView is working faster now.
>
> Michael
>
> Berk Geveci schrieb:
>>
>> Did you compile both yourself? What happens if you set
>> CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE to Release.
>>
>> -berk
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Michael Geppert
>> <MichaelGeppert at gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm using the ParaView development version (3.3.0) and I'm observing a
>>> speed loss compared to the releases (reading, filtering and animating of
>>> bigger data sets takes about 30% more time). Is there any special flag
>>> or part in the development version, that is slowing everything down? I
>>> tested ParaView 3.3.0 from cvs and the release 3.2.1, both compiled with
>>> shared libraries..
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ParaView mailing list
>>> ParaView at paraview.org
>>> http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>


More information about the ParaView mailing list