View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0015167 | ParaView | (No Category) | public | 2014-12-02 13:17 | 2016-06-09 10:58 | ||||
Reporter | Alan Scott | ||||||||
Assigned To | Utkarsh Ayachit | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||||||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||||||
Product Version | 4.2 | ||||||||
Target Version | 5.1 | Fixed in Version | 5.1 | ||||||
Summary | 0015167: Spreadsheet view and multiple blocks | ||||||||
Description | Please change Spreadsheet View to include all blocks, not just the first block. This is confusing, and awkward. Here is a writeup from a user: I guess I don't understand why showing more than 1 block at a time is a problem. Suppose I am looking at shear strain in the Belt end region. I probably want to look at multiple components (blocks). I don't know why I shouldn't be allowed to select 2 or 3 or 4 blocks to be visible in the spreadsheet. I want to pick on elements and see their property values in the spreadsheet. Yes, I can merge blocks beforehand but that is very limiting - once I merge blocks, I lose the ability to conveniently turn components on and off using the Multi-block inspector. I might have to extract 3 blocks to make a merged set, then examine that, then decide I want to look at adjoining elements in an adjoining block and have to repeat the whole thing over again. As far as partial arrays, what is the difference between merging blocks and displaying in the spreadsheet and displaying all the individual blocks in the spreadsheet? I can't count the times I've had to merge all blocks, sort spreadsheet to get some max/min values, then delete the merged blocks to do some selection by blocks and proceed with other operations. It seems like an inefficiency to constantly have to merge blocks to see stuff in the spreadsheet. What advantage is there to only showing 1 block at a time? Dennis | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Project | Sandia | ||||||||
Topic Name | |||||||||
Type | feature | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Relationships | |
Relationships |
Notes | |
(0035272) Alan Scott (manager) 2015-10-09 20:33 |
This caught me again today. Needs to not slip past 5.1. |
(0035710) Alan Scott (manager) 2016-02-11 12:55 |
Dennis expressed a need for this yet again today. Must be in 5.1. (Not bugging - just reminding myself...) |
(0035711) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2016-02-11 13:23 |
yup, he mentioned :). |
(0035826) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2016-03-07 14:42 |
MR: https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/678 [^] |
(0035893) Alan Scott (manager) 2016-04-15 22:23 |
Didn't appear to work. Be sure to test before closing. |
(0035897) Utkarsh Ayachit (administrator) 2016-04-15 23:02 |
On the Properties Tab, there's a "Composite Data Set Index" selection under "Display" properties, change that to select whichever blocks you want to see, including the root. By default it still shows 1 block as it's less work to show that. Let me know if you want to change the default. |
(0035901) Alan Scott (manager) 2016-04-19 13:38 |
Nice. Lets leave defaults as they are for now. If we decide to change defaults (to all on), we can do it after more feedback, and in another bug. Tested master, Linux, remote server, with bake.e. |
Notes |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2014-12-02 13:17 | Alan Scott | New Issue | |
2014-12-02 13:17 | Alan Scott | Target Version | => 4.4 |
2015-01-02 10:43 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Fixed in Version | => 4.3 |
2015-07-08 16:36 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Status | backlog => todo |
2015-07-13 11:37 | Dan Lipsa | Assigned To | => Dan Lipsa |
2015-07-13 11:37 | Dan Lipsa | Status | todo => active development |
2015-07-17 17:05 | Dan Lipsa | Status | active development => todo |
2015-07-17 17:05 | Dan Lipsa | Assigned To | Dan Lipsa => |
2015-07-20 11:15 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Assigned To | => Utkarsh Ayachit |
2015-07-20 11:15 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Status | todo => active development |
2015-09-11 16:43 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Target Version | 4.4 => 5.1 |
2015-10-09 20:33 | Alan Scott | Note Added: 0035272 | |
2016-02-11 12:55 | Alan Scott | Note Added: 0035710 | |
2016-02-11 13:23 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Note Added: 0035711 | |
2016-03-07 14:42 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Note Added: 0035826 | |
2016-03-07 14:42 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Status | active development => gatekeeper review |
2016-03-07 14:42 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Resolution | open => fixed |
2016-03-14 11:06 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Status | gatekeeper review => customer review |
2016-03-14 11:06 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Fixed in Version | 4.3 => git-master |
2016-04-15 22:23 | Alan Scott | Note Added: 0035893 | |
2016-04-15 23:02 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Note Added: 0035897 | |
2016-04-19 13:38 | Alan Scott | Note Added: 0035901 | |
2016-04-19 13:38 | Alan Scott | Status | customer review => closed |
2016-06-09 10:58 | Utkarsh Ayachit | Fixed in Version | git-master => 5.1 |
Issue History |
Copyright © 2000 - 2018 MantisBT Team |