<div dir="ltr">I can think of two options for this, the first is modifying the co-processing script to get the data you want directly from the output without writing it to disk. Look at <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Python_Scripting">http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Python_Scripting</a> for some information on that. Otherwise, you can try using the Python programmable filter to extract the data as well and write it to disk.<br>
<br>If it was me I'd go with the first option.<br><br>Andy<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Hong Yi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hongyi@renci.org" target="_blank">hongyi@renci.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thanks, Andy. In our case, users only want to observe one integrated velocity value (one output value from Integrate Variable Filter) for the slice at each
time step so that they can determine from which time point on this velocity value stops changing which indicates to them the simulation has converged. So this large amount of output files from the ParallelUnstructuredGridWriter is hard to serve this purpose.
I am wondering whether there is a way for me to export the SpreadSheetRepresentation view (to view Integrate Variable Filter output) as a screen capture when I export pipeline in python for coprocessing? It looks like the “Export State” GUI for coprocessing
only allows to export rendered views, not other types of views. If not, I am thinking perhaps I can write a customized writer plugin to only export the needed output value for our purpose and to make this writer only exports one file for each time step regardless
of the number of processors it runs on.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Thanks for any more information you can provide!<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Hong<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif""> Andy Bauer [mailto:<a href="mailto:andy.bauer@kitware.com" target="_blank">andy.bauer@kitware.com</a>]
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:43 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Hong Yi<br>
<b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:paraview@paraview.org" target="_blank">paraview@paraview.org</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Paraview] Output of ParallelUnstructuredGridWriter running on multiple nodes<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Hi,<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">The parallel XML data set writers all write independently of each other (no MPI communication is needed in the writers). Because of this they can't tell process 0 when writing it's meta-data file that it doesn't
need to write out meta data for them. <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Andy<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Hong Yi <<a href="mailto:hongyi@renci.org" target="_blank">hongyi@renci.org</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am running a simulation in-situ linked with ParaView CoProcessing library with a pipeline that includes “slice->Integrate Variables Filter->ParallelUnstructuredGridWriter” so
that integrated velocity value for a slice at each time point can be written out while running the simulation in-situ. The output from this ParallelUnstructureGridWriter for each time step includes one pvtu file plus one vtu file from each running node, so
that is a lot of output files for each time point especially when running on a large number of nodes in parallel. However, it looks like only the output vtu file from processing node 0 includes valid velocity range value while other output vtu files from other
nodes include only blank/empty values. So I am wondering whether there is a good way to set up only outputting vtu file from processing node 0 to prevent output of those large number of files that don’t include valid/useful values. Any suggestions are very
much appreciated. <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#888888">Hong<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView" target="_blank">
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>