Hi, Christian, <div> We can the filter back (probably under a different name). Do you mind sending me the data file you have? </div><div>thanks!<br>Leo</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Christian Richter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:christian.richter@ovgu.de" target="_blank">christian.richter@ovgu.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Hi Leo,<br>
<br>
thanks for your answer.<br>
My Problem is, I only have particle data (Position at dumptime,
velocity at dumptime) and no vector field (result of a simple
DEM-Simulation).<br>
<br>
I read your article and played arround with TerminationTime and
the Animation Panel but I found no solution. And because the old
filter works well the c&p solution is the best for my case. I
would like to ask if we could have both filter in PV 4 - the best
filter for each special case.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Christian<br>
<br>
Am 05.12.2012 21:05, schrieb Yuanxin Liu:<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<blockquote type="cite">Hi, <span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.800000190734863px">Christian,</span>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br>
</font>
<div> The old ParticlePathLine filter is replaced by
ParticlePath filter. Unlike the old one, you do not have to
attach it to a particle tracer. Also make sure you set the
"TerminationTime" parameter to the largest possible time. </div>
<div> </div>
<div> I have written an article about this work: . <a href="http://www.kitware.com/source/home/post/76" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/source/home/post/76</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div> Let me know if this works for you.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>thanks,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Leo</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM,
Christian Richter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:christian.richter@ovgu.de" target="_blank">christian.richter@ovgu.de</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello,<br>
<br>
in Paraview 3.98 the ParticlePathLines Filter is gone away.
We use this to show the trajectory of simple particle data
(x,y,z), based on ID. Is this intended ?<br>
<br>
I got it back by copy & paste the proxysource from
filter.xml in 3.14 (line 6679++) to 3.98. Would it be
possible to add back the old ParticlePathlines Filter (with
single inputsource and Pathline & Particle as output) in
3.98 because I love the webGL scene export in the new
Paraview.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Christian<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Powered by <a href="http://www.kitware.com" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
<br>
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at <a href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html" target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
<br>
Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki
at: <a href="http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView" target="_blank">http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView</a><br>
<br>
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
<a href="http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview" target="_blank">http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>